Smart power
Abstract
The concept of smart power is discussed. The main attention is paid on employment of smart power in contemporary world politics, particularly in the U.S. foreign policy in the light of American competition for world leadership and hegemony with the expanding China, India and the European Union. The author analyses history and current condition of the national strategy of smart power in the USA and other countries. He also examines the grand state strategy as a premise for the formation of global governance, based both on national and supranational efforts.
References
1. Absolutely // The Economist. – L., 2010. – 23 January, N 4. – P. 75.
2. Allaby D. We underestimate the value of soft power. – 2009. – Mode of access: http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=13333 (Дата посещения: 27.07.2012.)
3. Beukel E. China and the South China sea: Two faces of power in the rising China’s neighborhood policy. – Copenhagen: Danish institute for international studies, 2010. – 26 p. – Mode of access: http://www.diis.dk/sw92785.asp (Дата посещения: 28.07.2012.)
4. Brzezinski Z. Second chance: Three presidents and the crisis of American superpower. – N.Y.: Basic Books, 2007. – 234 p.
5. Clarke R.A. How to win the war on terror // Newark Star Ledger. – New Jersey, 2004. – 21 November.
6. Craig G., Gilbert F. Reflections on strategy in the present and future // Makers of modern strategy: From Machiavelli to the nuclear age / Paret P. (ed.). – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1986. – 871 p.
7. America’s national interests: A report from the commission on America’s National Interests. – Cambridge: The Commission, 1996. – 60 p.
8. Ferguson N. The decade the world tilted east // Financial Times. – L., 2009. – 28 December. – Mode of access: http://www.angellam.com/news/FT.com%20-%20The%20decade%20the%20world%20tilted%20east.pdf (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
9. Gaddis J. Strategies of containment. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1982. – 432 p.
10. Ganz M. Why David sometimes wins. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2009. – 368 p.
11. Ikenberry J. When China rules the world: The end of the Western world and the birth of a new global order: Review // Foreign affairs. – N.Y., 2009. – Vol. 88. – Mode of access: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65610/martin-jacques/when-china-rules-the-world-the-end-of-the-western-world-and-the- (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
12. Inboden W. What is power? And how much of it does America have? // Holidays. – Dhaka, 2009. – 24 May.
13. Kaul I., Grunberg I., Stern M.A. Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st Century. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1999. – 17 p.
14. Keltner D. The power paradox // Greater good. – Berkeley, 2007. – Vol. 8. – P. 17.
15. Gallaroti G. The power curse: Influence and illusion in world politics. – Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009. – 209 p.
16. Kennedy P. Rome offers Obama a lesson in limits // Financial Times. – L., 2009. – 30 December.
17. Kennedy R. The elements of strategic thinking: A practical guide // Teaching strategy: Challenge and response / Marcella G. (ed.). – Carlisle, PA: US Army Strategic Studies Institute, 2010. – 26 p.
18. Keohane R.O. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1984. – 312 p.
19. Snidal D. The limits of hegemonic stability theory // International organization. – Cambridge, MA, 1985. – Vol. 39. – P. 580–614.
20. Keohane R.O., Victor D. The regime complex for climate change. – Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 2010. – 34 p. – (Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements: Discussion Paper; 10–33.)
21. Kindleberger C.P. World economic primacy, 1500–1990. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press. – 1996. – 223 p.
22. Kissinger H. Diplomacy. – N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1994. – 912 p.
23. Kissinger H. Realists vs. idealists // International Herald Tribune. – N.Y., 2005. – 12 May. – Mode of access: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/11/opinion/11iht-edkissinger.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (Дата посещения: 10.08.2012.)
24. Krauthammer C. The Bush doctrine: ABM, Kyoto, and the New American Unilateralism // The Weekly Standard. – Washington, DC, 2001. – 4 June. – Mode of access: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Protected/Articles/000/000/000/474abspw.asp (Дата посещения: 10.08.2012.)
25. Laidi Z. Europe as a risk averse power: A hypothesis // Garnet Policy Brief. – Coventry: Univ. of Warwick, 2010. – Vol. 11. – 16 p.
26. Illegitimacy moderates the effect of power on approach / Lammers J., Galinsky A., Gordijn E., Otten S. // Psychological Science. – N.Y., 2008. – Vol. 19. – P. 558–564.
27. Luce E. Obama doctrine hinges on economy // Financial Times. – L., 2010. – 28 May.
28. Mandelbaum M. The case for Goliath: How America acts as the world’s government in the twenty-first century. – N.Y.: Public Affairs, 2005. – 320 p.
29. Martinez-Diaz L., Woods N. The G20 – the perils and opportunities of network governance for developing countries. – Oxford: Univ. of Oxford, 2009. – 4 p. – Mode of access: http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/G20_
30. PolicyBrief.pdf (Дата посещения: 27.07.2012.)
31. Mayo A., Nohria N. In their times: The greatest business leaders of the twentieth century. – Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005. – 444 p.
32. McDougal W.A. Can the United States do grand strategy? // Orbis. – Philadelphia, PA, 2010. – Vol. 54. – P. 165–184.
33. Norrlof C. America’s global advantage: US hegemony and international cooperation. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2010. – 286 p.
34. Nye J. The future of power. – N.Y.: Public affairs press, 2011. – 320 p.
35. Nye J. The powers to lead. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2008. – 240 p.
36. Obama B. National security strategy. – Washington, DC: The White House, 2010. – 52 p. – Mode of access: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf (Дата посещения: 28.07.2012.)
37. Olson M. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard univ. press, 1965. – 176 p.
38. Putnam R., Bayne N. Hanging together: The seven-power summits. – Cambridge: Harvard univ. press, 1984. – 262 p.
39. Pomfret J. Newly powerful China defies Western nations with remarks, Policies // Washington Post. – Washington, DC, 2010. – 15 March.
40. Posen B. Command of the commons: The military foundation of U.S. Hegemony // International Security. – Cambridge: Harvard univ., 2003. – Vol. 28. – P. 5–46.
41. Posen B.R. The case for restraint // The American Interest. – Washington, DC, 2007. – Vol. 6. – Mode of access: http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=331 (Дата посещения: 10.08.2012.)
42. Sanger D. A red ink decade // New York Times. – N.Y., 2010. – 2 February.
43. Restraining order: For strategic modesty / Sapolsky H., Friedman B. H., Golz E., Press D. // World Affairs. – Washington, DC, 2009. – Vol. 172. – Mode of access: http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/restraining-order-strategic-modesty (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
44. Gaddis J.L. Strategies of containment: A critical appraisal of postwar American national security policy. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1982. – 448 p.
45. Slaughter A.-M. America’s edge: Power in the networked century // Foreign Affairs, 2009. – Vol. 88, N 1. – Mode of access: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/63722/anne-marie-slaughter/americas-edge (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
46. Suri J. American grand strategy from the Cold war’s end to 9/11 // Orbis. – Philadelphia, PA, 2009. – Vol. 53. – P. 611–627.
47. Walt S. Taming American power: The global response to U.S. Primacy. – N.Y.: W.W. Norton, 2005. – 320 p.
48. Yasushi W., McConnell D. Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States. – Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 2008. – 328 p.
Review
Views:
232
Email this article 
Post a Comment 