РЕШАЯ ВОПРОСЫ ВМЕСТЕ, ИЛИ КАК ВОПЛОТИТЬ ИДЕАЛЫ ДЕЛИБЕРАТИВНОЙ ДЕМОКРАТИИ ЧЕРЕЗ ИНТЕРНЕТ
Аннотация
Статья предлагает вниманию читателей обзор докладов, представленных на IV Международной конференции по онлайн-делиберации, прошедшей в г. Лидс (Великобритания) в 2010 г. и посвященной поиску ответов на социальные и технологические вызовы, с которыми сталкивается эта относительно новая область исследований. Обзор предваряется кратким описанием теоретических предпосылок возникновения интереса к данной проблематике в современной политической науке. На примерах конкретных работ рассматриваются основные направления исследований. В заключение обсуждаются дальнейшие перспективы исследований в сфере политических онлайн-дискуссий, в том числе и применительно к отечественным реалиям.
Об авторе
Борис Олегович Соколов
Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет ; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Дмитриев В.М., Ганджа В.В. Автоматизированная система онлайн-проектирования // Доклады ТУСУРа. – Томск, 2011. – № 2 (24), Ч. 2. – С. 331–333.
2. Докторов Б. Методология и практика опросов обогащенного общественного мнения // Социальная реальность. – М., 2007. – № 10. – http://socreal.fom.ru/?link=ARTICLE&aid=463 (Дата посещения: 03.08.2012.)
3. Каневский М.А. Проектирование интеллектуальных систем онлайн-взаимодействия органов власти с гражданами и бизнесом на основе коллективного опыта и техник обмена знаниями. – Режим доступа: http://www.emag.iis.ru/arc/infosoc/emag.nsf/0/0113f7366fec13914425796e003f433a?OpenDocument&Click= (Дата посещения: 03.08.2012.)
4. Лебедев П.А., Полякова В.В. Форумная онлайн-дискуссия: проблемы организации и проведения // Онлайн-исследования в России 2.0 / Под ред. Шашкина А.В., Девятко И.Ф., Давыдова С.Г. – М.: РИЦ «СевероВосток», 2010. – С. 173–180.
5. Bicking M., Wimmer M.A. Tools and technologies in e-participation: Insights from project evaluation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 75–86. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
6. Blomgren Bingham L. Online deliberation and the United States open government initiative // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 53–59. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
7. Bohman J. Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy // The journal of political philosophy. – Malden, МА, 1998. – Vol. 6, N 4. – P. 400–425.
8. Buchstein H. Bytes that bite: The internet and deliberative democracy // Constellations. – N.Y., 1997. – Vol. 4, N 2. – P. 248–263.
9. Cindio F. de, Peraboni C. Design issues for building deliberative digital habitats // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 41–52. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
10. Cohen J. Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy // The good polity / Hamlin A., Pettit P. (eds). – Oxford: Blackwell, 1989. – P. 17–34.
11. Dahlberg L. The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere // Information, communication & society. – N.Y., 2001. – Vol. 4, N 4. – P. 615–633.
12. Dahlgren P. The internet and the democratization of civic culture // Political communication. – 2000. – Vol. 17. – P. 335–340.
13. Dahlgren P. The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation // Political communication. – 2005. – Vol. 22, N 2. – P. 147–162.
14. Desquinabo N., Ferrand N. Online deliberation and impact on decision: A local planning case// From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 157–171. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.
15. dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
16. Developing and using online tools for deliberative democracy (Carnegie Mellon university, June 19–21, 2003). – Mode of access: http://web.archive.org/web/20060314061609/http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/style/Seminar.html (Дата посещения: 25.09.2012.)
17. Elster J. Introduction // Deliberative democracy / Elster J. (ed.). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 1–18.
18. Elster J. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory // Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics / Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. – P. 3–33.
19. Fearon J.D. Deliberation as discussion // Deliberative democracy / Elster J (ed). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 44–68.
20. Fishkin J.S., Luskin R.C. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion // Acta Politica. – 2005. – Vol. 40, N 3. – P. 284–298.
21. From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – 267 p. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
22. Gimmler A. Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet // Philosophy and social criticism. – L., 2001. – Vol. 27, N 4. – P. 21–39.
23. Graham T. What’s wife swap have to do with it? Talking politics online // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 101–116. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
24. Gutmann A., Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? – Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 2004. – 256 p.
25. Habermas J. Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research // Communication theory. – Malden, MA, 2006. – Vol. 16 (4). – P. 411–426.
26. Hees M. van. The limits of epistemic democracy // Social choice and welfare. – 2007. – Vol. 28, N 4. – P. 649–666.
27. Karlsson M. What does it take to make online deliberation happen? A comparative analysis of 28 Online discussion forums // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 142–156. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
28. Kies R., Wojcik S. European web-deliberation: lessons from the european citizens consultation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 198–211. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
29. Landa D., Meirowitz A. Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy // American journal of political science. – 2009. – Vol. 53, N 2. – P. 427–444.
30. Liddo A. de, Shum B.S. Capturing and representing deliberation in participatory planning practices // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 27–40. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
31. List C., Dryzek J. Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation // British journal of political science. – Cambridge, 2003. – Vol. 33, N 1. – P. 1–28.
32. List C., Goodin R.E. Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem // Journal of political philosophy. – 2001. – Vol. 9, N 3. – P. 277–306.
33. Loukis E., Wimmer M.A. Analysing different models of structured electronic consultation on legislation under formation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 14–26. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
34. Manosevitch E. Mapping the practice of online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 172–188. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
35. Merwe R., Van der, Meehan A. Direct deliberative governance online: Consensual problem solving or accommodated pluralism? // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 87–100. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
36. Michelman F. How can the people ever make the laws. A critique of deliberative democracy // Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics / Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. – 179 p.
37. Miller D. Deliberative democracy and social choice // Political studies. – Oxford, 1992. – Vol. 40. – P. 54–67.
38. Misnikov Y. Discursive qualities of public discussion on the Russian internet: Testing the Habermasian communicative action empirically // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 60–74. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
39. Monnoyer-Smith L., Talpin J. Participatory frames in deliberative devices: the ideal-EU case study // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 250–258. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
40. Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice / T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan (eds.). – Stanford, Calif.: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. – 374 p.
41. Smith K.L. Ethnographically exploring deliberation through policy pertinent social media production in Ontario // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 212–218. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
42. Smith S. Mobilising civic resources through eParticipation in the european public sphere: problem-solving, relegitimisation or decoupling? // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 126–141. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/
43. Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
44. Snaith M., Lawrence J., Reed C. Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 2–14. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
45. Stokes S.G. Pathologies of deliberation // Deliberative democracy / Elster J. (ed). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 123–139.
46. Stromer-Galley J., Muhlberger P., Webb N. Deliberative e-rulemaking decision facilitation: Challenges to enacting real world deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 232–239. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
47. Tools for participation: Collaboration, participation, and decision support (University of California, Berkeley, June 26–29, 2008). – Mode of access: http://www.publicsphereproject.org/events/diac08/ (Дата посещения: 25.09.2012).
48. Trice M. Comment fields and content analysis: A means to study interaction on news sites // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 189–197. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
49. Velikanov C. Facilitation procedures for written online deliberation: A research and development project in the field of deliberative democracy // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 240–249. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
50. Wright S. Political as usual? Revolution, normalisation and a new agenda for online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 219–231 – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
51. Zhang W. Simulating the ideal eDeliberation: The roles of inclusion, equalization and rationalization // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 117–125. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)
Рецензия
Просмотров:
70
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 