PRO ИЛИ CONTRA? ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ АКТУАЛИЗАЦИИ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИХ ПОЗИЦИЙ УЧАСТНИКАМИ ПУБЛИЧНОЙ ДИСКУССИИ В РУССКОЯЗЫЧНОМ «ЖИВОМ ЖУРНАЛЕ»
Аннотация
В работе представлены результаты эмпирического исследования использования «базовых притязаний на нормативную правоту» Юргена Хабермаса для лучшего понимания эпистемологической ценности онлайновых делиберативных практик. Анализ диалогически интерактивного процесса актуализации таких притязаний участниками дискуссии позволил выявить путем агрегирования высказанных позиций «за» и «против» степень их взаимной солидаризации вокруг обсуждаемых политических вопросов. Делается вывод о возможности дискурсивного выражения общественного мнения в виртуальной среде Интернета и его изучения.
Список литературы
1. Леви К. Жесткие меры в одном регионе демонстрируют, насколько меньше демократии стало в России Путина. – 2008. – 22 февраля. – Режим доступа: http://nytimesinmoscow.livejournal.com/2245.html (Дата посещения: 06.11.2012.)
2. Мисников Ю.Г. Интернет-дискуссии в демократической теории и практике // Социальные сети и виртуальные сетевые сообщества: Сб. науч. тр. / РАН. ИНИОН. Центр социал. науч.-информ. исслед. Отв. ред. Верченов Л.Н., Ефременко Д.В., Тищенко В.И. – М., 2012. – С. 27–36.
3. Bohman J. Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996. – 320 p.
4. Coleman S., Anthony S., Morrison D.E. Public trust in the news: A constructivist study of the social life of the news. – Oxford: Reuters institute for the study of journalism of the university of Oxford, 2009. – 47 p.
5. Coleman S., Blumler J. The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2009. – 220 p.
6. Collaborative discourse structures in computer mediated group communications / Turoff M., Hiltz R.S., Bieber M., Fjermestad J., Rana A. // Journal of computer mediated communication. – Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999. – Vol. 4(4). – Mode of access: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00104.x/full (Дата посещения: 01.11.2012.)
7. Dodge M., Kitchin R. Mapping cyberspace. – London: Routledge, 2001. – 260 p.
8. Dodge M., Kitchin R. Mapping Internet infrastructure // Moving people, goods and information: The cutting-edge infrastructure of networked cities / Hanley R. (ed.). – N.Y.: Routledge, 2004. – P. 146–167.
9. Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net / Jones S. (ed.). – Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999. – 328 p.
10. Donath J., Karahalios K., Viegas F. Visualizing conversation // Journal of computer-mediated communication. – Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999. – Vol. 4(4). – Mode of access: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00107.x/full (Дата посещения: 01.11.2012.)
11. Fossato F., Lloyd J., Verkhovsky A. The Web that failed: How opposition politics and independent initiatives are failing on the Internet in Russia. – Oxford: Univ. of Oxford, Reuters institute for the study of journalism, 2008. – 61 p.
12. Freelon D. Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication // New media & society. – L., 2010. – Vol. 12(7). – P. 1172–1190.
13. Graham T. Needles in a haystack: A new approach in identifying and assessing political talk in non-political discussion forums // Javnost – The Public. – Ljubljana, 2008. – Vol. 15(2). – P. 17–36.
14. Gruber H. Specific genre features of new mass media // Handbook of communication in the public sphere / Wodak R., Koller V. (eds.). – Berlin, N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. – P. 363–382.
15. Guimaraes M.J. Doing anthropology in cyberspace: Fieldwork boundaries and social environments // Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet / Hine C. (ed.). – Oxford, N.Y.: Berg, 2005. – P. 141–156.
16. Habermas J. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. – 631 p.
17. Habermas J. Further reflections on the public sphere // Habermas and the public sphere / Calhoun C. (ed.). – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992 a. – P. 421–461.
18. Habermas J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992 c. – 225 p.
19. Habermas J. On the pragmatics of communication. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998. – 462 p.
20. Habermas J. Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research // Communication theory. – Hoboken, NJ, 2006. – Vol. 16(4). – P. 411–426.
21. Habermas J. The philosophical discourse of modernity. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987 a. – 430 p.
22. Habermas J. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989. – 301 p.
23. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987 b. – Vol. 2. – 457 p.
24. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society (volume 1). – Boston: Beacon, 1984. – 465 p.
25. Habermas J. Truth and justification. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. – 349 p.
26. Habermas J. Concluding remarks // Habermas and the public sphere / Calhoun C. (ed.). – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992 b. – P. 462–479.
27. Heiskala R. Sociology as a discursive space: The coming age of a new orthodoxy? // Acta Sociologica, Eastern European Social Changes. – Oslo, 1990. – Vol. 33 (4). – P. 305–320.
28. Herbst S. Public opinion infrastructures: Meanings, measures, media // Political Communication. – L., 2001. – Vol. 18. – P. 451–464.
29. Herbst S. The meaning of public opinion // Media, Culture and Society. – L., 1993. – Vol. 15. – P. 437–454.
30. Hine C. Virtual methods and the sociology of cyber-scientific knowledge // Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet / Hine C. (ed.). – Oxford, N.Y.: Berg, 2005. – P. 1–16.
31. Ikeda K., Huckfeldt R. Political communication and disagreement among citizens in Japan and the United States // Political behavior. – Lexington, Kentucky, 2001. – Vol. 21(1). – P. 23–51.
32. Internet research methods: a practical guide for the social and behavioral sciences / Hewson C., Yule P., Laurent D., Vogel C. – L., Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, 2003. – 156 p.
33. Joinson A. Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. – Houndmills, Hampshire, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. – 224 p.
34. Kelly J., Fisher D., Smith M. Debate, division, and diversity: Political discourse networks in USENET newsgroups: Paper prepared for Online Deliberation Conference 2005, Stanford University, May 24, 2005. – Mode of access: http://www.coi.columbia.edu/pdf/kelly_fisher_smith_ddd.pdf (Дата посещения: 6.10.2008.). – 34 p.
35. Misnikov Y. Discursive qualities of public discussion on the Russian Internet: testing the Habermasian communicative action empirically // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the fourth international conference on online deliberation, OD2010, Leeds, UK, 30 June – 2 July, 2010 / De Cindio F., Macintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Univ. of Leeds and univ. Degli Studi Di Milano. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 24.02.2011). – P. 60–74.
36. Misnikov Y. How to read and treat online public discussions among ordinary citizens beyond political mobilisation: Empirical evidence from the Russian-language online forums // Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media. – Leeds, 2012. – Vol. 7. – Mode of access: http://www.digitalicons.org/issue07/files/2012/06/7.1_Misnikov.pdf (Дата посещения: 1.08.2012). – P. 1–37.
37. Mutz D. Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy? – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2006. – 184 p.
38. Network and netplay: virtual groups on the Internet / Sudweeks F., McLaughlin M.L., Rafaeli S. (eds.). – Menlo Park CA, Cambridge MA, L.: AAA Press/ MIT Press, 1998. – 313 p.
39. Papacharissi Z. The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere // New Media & Society. – L., 2002. – Vol. 4(1). – P. 9–27.
40. Public discourse in the Russian blogosphere: Mapping RuNet politics and mobilization / Etling B., Alexanyan K., Kelly J., Faris R., Palfrey J., Gasser U. – Cambridge: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard univ., 2010. – Mode of access: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 19.03.2012.) – 46 p.
41. Putnam R. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. – N.Y.: Simon and Schuster, 2000. – 541 p.
42. Rafaeli S., Sudweeks F. Networked interactivity // Journal of computer-mediated communication. – Vol. 2(4). – Bloomington: Indiana univ., 1997. – Mode of access: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x/full (Дата посещения: 17.10. 2009.)
43. Riffe D., Lacy S., Fico F.G. Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. – Mahwah, N.J.; L.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005. – 2 nd ed. – 251 p.
44. Sanders K. Communicating politics in the twenty-first century. – L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – 272 p.
45. Schneider S., Foot K. Online structure for political action: exploring presidential websites from the 2000 American election // Javnost – The Public. – Ljubljana, 2002. – Vol. 9(2). – P. 3–60.
46. Schneider S., Foot K. The Web as an object of study // Society online: the Internet in context / Howard P., Jones S. (eds.). – L.: Sage, 2004. – P. 137–154.
47. Schneider S., Foot K. Web sphere analysis: an approach to studying online action // Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet / Hine C. (ed.). – Oxford, N.Y.: Berg, 2005. – P. 157–170.
48. Silver J. The weight of opinion // The Guardian. – L., 2009. – 9 February. – Mode of access: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/09/newspaper-comment-pages (Дата посещения: 12.02.2009.)
49. Stempel G., Stewart R.K. The Internet provides both opportunities and challenges for mass communication researchers // Journalism & mass communication quarterly. – 2000. – L., Vol. 77. – P. 541–548.
50. Sudweeks F., Rafaeli S. How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: computer mediated communication and collaboration // Computer networking and scholarship in the 21 st century university / Harrison T., Stephen T. – Albany, N.Y.: State univ. of New York Press, 1996. – P. 115–136.
51. Sunstein C. Infotopia: how many minds produce knowledge. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2006. – 288 p.
52. Tsaliki L. Online forums and the enlargement of the public sphere: research findings from a European project // Javnost – The Public. – Ljubljana, 2002. – Vol. 9(2). – P. 95–112.
53. Wiklund H. A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities // New media & society. – L., 2005. – Vol. 7 (2). – P. 247–270.
54. Wilhelm A. Virtual sounding boards: how deliberative is online discussion? // Digital democracy: discourse and decision making in the information age / Hague B., Loader B. (eds.). – L., N.Y.: Routledge, 1999. – P. 153–178.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
62
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 