Public policy: development of world and Russian research of public policy
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.03.04
Abstract
The basic directions of contemporary research in the field of public policy are the subject of analysis. The experience of World and Russian public policy research is analyzed. The concepts of governance, political cycles, policy learning, advocacy coalition, multiple streams, boundary organizations are in the focus of analysis, as well as digital participation. In field of Russian researches network public policy, municipal public policy, concept of mediator institutes as well as influence of digitalization are subject of analysis. The institutional basement for public policy development (university chairs and research committee of Russian Political Science association) are object for analysis also.
References
1. Abramson J.B., Arterton Ch., Orren G. The electronic commonwealth: the impact of new media technologies on democratic values. New York: Basic books, 1988, 331 p.
2. Babincev V.P., Nadutkina I.E., Sapryka V.A. Expert community as a subject of civil participation in a region. The authority. 2014, N 7, P. 5-9. (In Russ.). EDN: SHWNVD
3. Baburkin S.A. The European convention on human rights and the institute of commissioners for human rights in Russia. Ivanovo state university bulletin. 2021, N 1, P. 45-50. (In Russ.). EDN: QYXVNJ
4. Balobanov A.E. Understanding the concept of "public policy". Public policy (RU). 2020, Vol. 4, N 2, P. 116-127. 10.31856/jpp/2020.2.7 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31856/jpp/2020.2.7(InRuss.)
5. Barandova T.L. Symbolic discursive practices of official human rights defense (Experience of visual political science). Saint Petersburg: Aletheia, 2021, 204 p. (In Russ.).
6. Belyaeva N.Y. Exploring protest publics: a new conceptual frame for civil participation analysis. In: Belyaeva N., Albert V., Zaytsev D. (eds). Protest publics. Societies and political orders in transition. Cham: Springer, 2019, P. 9-31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05475-5_2
7. Bryantsev I.I., Evstifeev R.V. Problems of evaluating the effectiveness of the institutions of state and society interaction (The cases of regional public Chambers of the Vladimir and Saratov Regions). Public administration issue. 2020, N 1, P. 115-136. (In Russ.). EDN: MAISPD
8. Cairney P., Zahariadis N. Multiple streams analysis: a flexible metaphor presents an opportunity to operationalize agenda setting processes. In: Zahariadis N. (ed.). Handbook of public policy Agenda-setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016, P. 1-28. DOI: 10.4337/9781784715922.00014
9. Cash D.W. In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information": agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Science, technology and human. 2001, Vol. 26, N 4, P. 431-453. DOI: 10.1177/016224390102600403 EDN: JQAKZT
10. Cohen M.D., March J.D., Olsen J.P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative science quarterly. 1972, Vol. 17, N 1, P. 1-25. DOI: 10.2307/2392088
11. Creighton J.L. The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005, 261 p.
12. Dyakov A.V. Political function of the intellectual: history and modernity. Polis. Political studies. 2019, N 1, P. 21-32. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.01.03 EDN: BMULFB
13. Dye T.R. Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1972, 305 p.
14. Fischer F. Participatory governance: from theory to practice. In: Levi-Faur D. (ed.).
15. The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2012, P. 457-471. %2F9780199560530.013.0032. DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB
16. Foucault M. The сourage of truth. The government of self and others. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2014, 358 p. (In Russ.).
17. Gaman-Golutvina O. (ed.). Governance and public policy at the XXI century. Moscow: RAPN, ROSSPEN, 2008, 408 p. (In Russ.).
18. Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A. E-government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government information quarterly. 2005, Vol. 22, P. 187-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
19. Guston D.H. Stabilizing the boundary between U.S. politics and science: the role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social studies of science. 1999, Vol. 29, N 1, P. 87-112. DOI: 10.1177/030631299029001004 EDN: JPZPJB
20. Heclo H. Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: from relief to income maintenance. New Haven; London: Yale university press, 1974, 349 p.
21. Hoppe R. Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers' and policymakers' discourses on boundary work. Poiesis & Praxis. 2009, Vol. 6, N 3-4, P. 235-256.
22. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman, 1995, 254 p.
23. Kondrashev A. Foreign agents in Russia: how a borrowed American legal institute acquired a different sense in Russian legislation and law enforcement practices.Comparative constitutional review. 2021, Vol. 30, N 4, P. 97-121. 10.21128/1812-7126-2021-4-97-121 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2021-4-97-121(InRuss.)
24. Krasin Yu. (ed.). Public policy in Russia: by results of project "University Kaligari - Gorbachev-Foundation". Moscow: Alpina business books, 2005, 358 p. (In Russ.).
25. Lasswell H.D. The Policy Orientation. In: Lerner D., Lasswell H.D. (eds). The policy sciences: recent developments in scope and method. Stanford: Stanford university press, 1951, P. 3-15.
26. Macintosh A. Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: 37 th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. 2004, P. 5-8. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300
27. Miroshnichenko I.V., Ryabchenko N.A. Ecosystem of network public administration: estimation of network environment reality for the innovative practice (on the example of the subjects of the Russian Federation). Human.Community. Management. 2017, N 4, P. 6-21. (In Russ.).
28. Miroshnichenko I.V., Kol'ba A.I. Scientific school of "Public policy and governance" Kuban state university: a role in the development of domestic social and political sciences. In: Astapov M. (ed.). Kuban state university: 100 years in Russian history. Krasnodar: Kuban State University, 2020, P. 335-346. (In Russ.).
29. Miroshnichenko I.V., Morozova E.V.Network communities as agencies for the formation of city's agenda (the case of "Help the City" movement). Political expertise: POLITEX. 2021, Vol. 17, N 2, P. 135-149. DOI: 10.21638/spbu23.2021.202 EDN: NQAICK
30. Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimec V.N.Introduction to the subject field of municipal public policy. Socio-political studies. 2019, N 4(5), P. 36-53. %D0%A5-2019-545 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2658-428 EDN: PXRVRF
31. Pateman C. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1970, 122 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511720444
32. Public policy in soft security: Baltic dimension. Saint Petersburg: Norma, 2003, 159 p. (In Russ.).
33. Radikov I. (ed.). Transformation of public policy in contemporary Russia: textbook. Moscow: RUSAJNS, 2022, 220 p. (In Russ.).
34. Rhodes R.A.W. Understanding governance: ten years on. Organization studies. 2007, Vol. 28(8), P. 1243-1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840607076586. EDN: JOQQJF
35. Rhodes R. The new governance without government. In: Danilova N. Yu.
36. Gurova O. Yu., Zhidkova N.G. (eds). Public policy: from theory to practice. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia, 2008, P. 51-74. (In Russ.).
37. Sabatier P. The acquisition and utilization of technical information by administrative agencies. Administrative science quarterly. 1978, Vol. 23, N 3, P. 396-417. DOI: 10.2307/2392417
38. Sabatier P. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European public policy. 1998, Vol. 5, N 1, P. 98-130. DOI: 10.1080/13501768880000051
39. Sabatier P.A., Weible C.M. The advocacy coalition framework. In: Sabatier P.A. (ed.). Theories of the policy process (2 nd ed.). New York: Routledge, 2007, P. 189-220. DOI: 10.4324/9780367274689-7
40. Sabatier P., Jenkins-Smith H. Advocacy coalition framework: an appraisal. In: Danilova N. Yu., Gurova O. Yu., Zhidkova N.G. (eds). Public policy: from theory to practice. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia, 2008, P. 94-154. (In Russ.).
41. Sabatier P.A. (ed.). Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview press, 1999, 289 p. DOI: 10.1017/s0003055400400481
42. Sabatier P.A. (ed.). Theories of the policy process. Second edition. New York: Routledge, 2007, 352 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780367274689
43. Sabatier P.A., Wieble C.M. (eds). Theories of the policy process. Third edition. Boulder: Westview press, 2014, 423 p.
44. Sabatier P.A., Wieble C.M. (eds). Theories of the policy process. Fourth edition. New York: Routledge, 2017, 417 p.
45. Smorgunov L.V. Digitalization and network effectiveness of public governability. EDN: KHMUCH
46. Political science (RU). 2021, N 3, P. 13-36. http://www.10.31249/poln/2021.03.01 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31249/poln/2021.03.01(InRuss.) EDN: KHMUCH
47. Smorgunov L.V.Interaction of state and business in Russia: from lobbying to corporative public policy. Science and education: economy and economics; business, the law and management. 2016, N 4 (71), P. 100-104. (In Russ.).
48. Smorgunov L. (ed.). Public policy: institutes, digitalization, development. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2018, 349 p. (In Russ.).
49. Sokolov M.A. Annual volume of collected articles "Public policy". Political science (RU). 2015, N 3, P. 286-289. (In Russ.). EDN: UMKGQP
50. Solovyev A.I. Frontier zones of public policy. Political science (RU). 2021, N 3, P. 183-204. http://www.10.31249/poln/2021.03.08 (In Russ.). EDN: XNTKUW
51. Sulimov K.A. Systems of consultative and advisory bodies in contemporary Russia as institutional conditions for co-governance: between unification and diversity.
52. Bulletin of Perm university. Political science. 2018, N 1, P. 5-23. 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-1-5-23 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2018-1-5-23(InRuss.)
53. Sungurov A. Yu. Public policy: basic directions of research (world and Russian experience). Public policy journal (RU). 2017, N 1, P. 8-28. (In Russ.).
54. Sungurov A. Yu. Expert communities and power. Moscow: Political encyclopedia, 2020, 231 p. (In Russ.).
55. Sungurov A. Yu., Dubrovskij D.V., Karyagin M.E., Tinyakov D.K. Public-consultative councils as a way of involving expert knowledge in policy decision process (case of St. Petersburg). Public administration issues. 2020, N 2, P. 7-31. (In Russ.). EDN: KLFIND
56. Tarasenko A.V., Kulmala M. Representing interests and the crafting of social policy: viewing Russian veterans' organisations as brokers between state and society.
57. The journal of social policy studies. 2016, N 14(4), P. 551-568. (In Russ.).
58. Tukhvatulina L.A.Interdisciplinary and expert knowledge: a case of "Law and Economcs". Tomsk state university journal of philosophy, sociology and political science. 2018, N 46, P. 95-103. DOI: 10.17223/1998863H/46/11 EDN: YUOMWL
59. Vandysheva E.A. Strategies of NGOs in situation of introduction of foreign agent status. In: Gorny M., Sungurov A. (eds). Public policy - 2013. Volume of articles. Saint Petersburg: Norma, 2014, P. 76-85. (In Russ.).
60. Yakimec V.N., Nikovskaya L.I. Mechanisms and principles of intersectoral social.
61. Yanovskij K.E., Zhavoronkov S.V. Unlimited government endorsed by "scientifiс consensus". Social sciences and contemporary world. 2019, N 6, P. 91-103. 10.31857/S086904990007570-9 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S086904990007570-9(InRuss.) EDN: VGZIYD
Review
Views:
300
Email this article 
Post a Comment 