Preview

Political science

Advanced search

The Psychological Influence of Russian Society on Public policy

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.03.09

Abstract

The societal role in the public policy presupposes it’s recognition as an independent actor of political decision-making. But tackling the society rarely pays attention to its’ psychological state in each moment of the time. The paper discusses the results of the study that describes the current psychological state of Russian society and its’ capability to influence public policy. The author distinguishes two main trends. The first trend facilitates the societal role in public policy, i.e.: the growing level of society’s self-consciousness, high level of activism demand, the change of political «optics», in particular the growth of cognitive complexity and precision of political representations. The second trend is opposite to the first as during last two years Russian society was affected by the growth of negative emotional background, raise of political indifference, lack of political interest that are not less dangerous to stability of the state than riots, aggressiveness, protests. This trend shows the lack of readiness to mobilization that is necessary in the face of pandemic or military risks. But positive changes in psychological state of society concern the core of this phenomenon as the negative affects it’s periphery. It permits us to evaluate the changes in psychological state of Russian society as rather positive, though not stable ones.

About the Author

E. B. Shestopal
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Belyaeva N. Ju. Public policy in Russia: resistance of environment. Polis. Politicals tudies. 2007, N 1, P. 22-31. 10.17976/jpps/2007.01.03 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.01.03(InRuss.)

2. Chernysh M.F. Factors of influence on the state of happiness in the contemporary Russian society. Sociological science and practice. 2019, Vol. 7, N 2, P. 9-33. 10.19181/snsp.2019.7.2.6407 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2019.7.2.6407(InRuss.)

3. Dutkiewicz P., Kazarinova D.B. Fear as politics. Polis. Political studies. 2017, N 4, P. 8-21. 10.17976/jpps/2017.04.02 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.04.02(InRuss.) EDN: ZBGHMX

4. Emelianova T.P., Drobysheva T.V. Particularities of manifestations of collective emotions toward significant social events. Science. Culture. Society. 2016, N 2, P. 91-104. (In Russ.). EDN: AHPKTD

5. Gorshkov M.K., Krumm R., Petukhov V.V. (eds).Russia at a new turning point. Moscow: Alfa, 2009, 160 p. (In Russ.).

6. Leontiev D.A. Quality of life and the well-being: objective, subjective and agentic aspects. Psychological journal. 2020, Vol. 41, N 6, P. 86-95. 10.31857/S020595920012592-7 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920012592-7(InRuss.) EDN: MCILBM

7. Makusheva V.O., Nestik T.A. Socio-psychological preconditions and effects of trust in social institutions in a pandemic. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2020, N 6, P. 427-447. 10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1770 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1770(InRuss.) EDN: WBZVBU

8. Nikovskaya L.I. Public policy in contemporary Russia: between corporative-bureaucratic and civic-modernizatory choice. In: Public space, civic society and authorities. Moscow: RAPN, ROSSPEN, 2008, P. 122-131. (In Russ.).

9. Nestik T.A. Constructing of the collective future image in the state of uncertatinty. In: Asmolov A. (ed.). Mobilis in mobile: Personality in times of uncertainty. Moscow: YASK publishing, 2018, P. 213-225. (In Russ.).

10. Petukhov R.V. The request for change: political and value dimension. Polis. Political studies. 2020, N 6, P. 103-118. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.06.08 EDN: MGUUHH

11. Pishchik V.I. Value measurements of generations through actualized fears. Social psychology and society. 2019, Vol. 10, N 2, P. 67-81. 10.17759/sps. 2019100206 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/sps.2019100206(InRuss.) EDN: BTQPOD

12. Shestopal E. (ed.). Authorities and leaders in perception of Russian citizens (1993-2018). Мoscow: Ves mir, 2019, 656 p. (In Russ.).

13. Soloviev A.I. Political agenda of the government or why the state needs the society. Polis. Political studies. 2019, N 4, P. 8-25. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.04.02 EDN: LIKWHT

14. Soloviev A.I. Frontier zones of public policy. Political science (RU). 2021, N 3, P. 183-204. http://www.10.31249/poln/2021.03.08 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31249/poln/2021.03.08(InRuss.) EDN: XNTKUW

15. Sungurov A. Yu. Mediating institutions and their role in public policy evolution in Russia. In: Public policy in the context of modernization tasks in Russia. Moscow: RAPN, ROSSPEN, 2012, P. 195-218. (In Russ.).

16. Smorgunov L.V. (ed.). Governing the public policy. Moscow: Aspect press, 2015, 320 p. (In Russ.).

17. Urnov M. Ju. Emotions in political behavior. Moscow: Aspect press, 2008, 240 p.

18. Yakimets V.N.Intersectional social partnership: theory, principles, mechanisms. Moscow: URSS, 2004, 382 p. (In Russ.).

19. Yanitsky M.S. Value dimension of public mind. Novosibirsk: Siberian bureau RAS, 2012, 237 p. (In Russ.). EDN: RLDMPV


Review

Views: 203


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)