“We, the defenders of nations and liberties”. How the EU populist radical right discursively constructs identities: the case of the Rassemblement National

The article explores how the EU populist radical right in opposition to its national governments uses the concept of rights and freedoms when constructing identities. The research is based on a discourse analysis of speeches given by the leader of the French Rassemblement National Marine Le Pen in the run-up to the 2019 European parliamentary elections. The analysis of discursive strategies employed in these texts allows to empirically demonstrate and elaborate some of the existing theories on key ideological and discursive features of the populist radical right and its positions on rights and freedoms. It also shows, however, that these models need to be reviewed or altered in a number of aspects. The research corresponds to the existing models as it shows the opposition the Self vs. the Other to be one of the central elements in the populist radical right discourse. For instance, when speaking about rights and freedoms, Marine Le Pen constructs the identity of the French people and European peoples by opposing them to the negative Other along two axes: vertically - by constructing a populist opposition to the elites - and horizontally - by constructing a nativist opposition to alien identities. The people is predicated to possess various rights, the Rassemblement National is represented as the defender of these rights, while the elites and the aliens are depicted as a threat to these rights. Yet, these oppositions are not always clearly articulated with numerous ‘grey zones’ systematically constructed: the research demonstrates that the depiction of some actors in a positive or negative way depends on context. The European identity constructed by the populist radical right is also ambivalent: it is not completely rejected although the ongoing European integration project - the EU - is reproached for infringing rights and freedoms. In general, the analysis allows to conclude that the populist radical right in the EU should be regarded as an active contester in the ongoing interpretive struggle over the concept of rights and freedoms rather than its enemy.

1. Аристотель. Метафизика // Аристотель. Сочинения в четырех томах / под ред. В.Ф. Асмуса. М.: Мысль, 1976. Т. 1. C. 63-368.

2. Беседа с Ю.С. Степановым 2002 года // МЕТОД: Московский ежегодник трудов из обществоведческих дисциплин: cб. науч. тр. / РАН. ИНИОН. Центр перспект. методологий социально-гуманит. исслед.; ред. кол.: Ильин М.В., гл. ред., и др. М., 2012. Вып. 3: Возможное и действительное в социальной практике и научных исследованиях / ред. и сост. вып. Ильин М.В. С. 379-396.

3. Соссюр Ф. де. Курс общей лингвистики // Труды по языкознанию / пер. с франц. под ред. А.А. Холодовича. М.: Прогресс, 1977. С. 31-273.

4. Фомин И.В. Политические исследования в трансдисциплинарной перспективе: возможности семиотического инструментария // Политическая наука. 2015. № 2. С. 8-25. EDN: UMJPUN

5. Alduy C., Wahnich S. Marine Le Pen prise aux mots. Décryptage du nouveau discours frontiste. Paris: Seuil, 2015. 305 p.

6. Alekseev A. The concept of democracy in the discourse of the populist radical right: the case of the EU parliamentary elections // Journal of Language and Politics. Forthcoming.

7. Brubaker R. Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press, 2006. 296 p.

8. Dézé A. La " dédiabolisation ". Une nouvelle stratégie? // Les faux-semblants du Front national / S. Crépon, A. Dézé, N. Mayer (dir). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2015. P. 25-50.

9. European populism and human rights / J. Vidmar (ed.). Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2020. 354 p.

10. Hodge R., Kress G. Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity, 1988. 280 p.

11. Human rights in a time of populism: challenges and responses / Neuman G. (ed). Cambridge; New York; Melbourne; New Delhi; Singapore: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 250 p.

12. Le Pen, les mots. Analyse d'un discours d'extrême droite / Souchard M., Wahnich S., Cuminal I., Wathier V. Paris: Le Monde, 1997. 280 p.

13. Levinet M. Droits et libertés fondamentaux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010. 128 p.

14. Mudde C. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne; Madrid; Cape Town; Singapore; São Paulo: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2007. 406 p. EDN: UVJPUT

15. Mudde C. The populist Zeitgeist // Government and Opposition. 2004. Vol. 39, N 4. P. 541-563. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

16. Reisigl M., Wodak R. The Discourse-historical approach (DHA) // Methods of critical discourse studies / Wodak R., Meyer M. (eds). 3 rd ed. London: Sage, 2016. P. 23-61.

17. Saussure F. de. Cours de linguistique générale / publié par C. Bally et A. Séchehaye avec la collaboration de A. Riedlinger; ed. critique préparée par T. de Mauro; postf. de L.-J. Calvet. Paris: Payot, 1995. 520 p.

18. Sherry M. Identity // The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods / Given L. (ed). Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage, 2008. P. 415.

19. Wodak R. The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage, 2015. 256 p.