European Identity of Scotland in the context of Brexit

The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union focused the issue of cleavage of British statehood by European criteria. According to the results of sociological surveys and polls, the distribution of preferences of Brexit is correlated with the national identification matrix. Most Scots and Irish of United Kingdom support remaining the membership in the European Union, while the most English defend soft or hard Brexit. However, the depth of such cleavage underlines the uncertainty in the preferences of citizens who identify as British in general. In the context of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, the question of the European identity of Scots was also underlines by Scotland's regional political actors. This article is aimed to the analysis of the dynamics of the European identity of the Scottish community in 2016-2020 under Brexit conditions. The author concludes that the share of Scots with European identities increased after 2016, and Brexit was a key factor in the dynamics. At the same time, the actualization of European identity among the Scottish community is connected with the pragmatic strategy of the Scottish community and regional political actors to neutralize the negative economic and social effects of Brexit and plays an instrumental role in the national and European political arenas. The article starts with an excursion to the issues of national identity in the modern United Kingdom in the studies of Western and Russian authors. Then, based on an analysis of sociological data, the question of the European identity of Scots was raised, as well as the role of the national identity of United Kingdom citizens in the issue of membership in the European Union. At the end of the article, author proposes the description of the position and strategy of the Scottish community on the issue of Brexit.

1. Ананьева Е.В. Непредсказуемый Брекзит // Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН. 2018. № 4 (4). С. 99-105. EDN: YMCOGD

2. Ананьева Е.В. Разобщенная Британия // Современная Европа. 2017. № 5 (77). С. 5-15. EDN: ZULYYZ

3. Бабынина Л.О. Брекзит: соглашение о выходе подписано, проблемы остаются // Европейский Союз: факты и комментарии. 2018. № 94. С. 87-93. EDN: YYSVEL

4. Бабынина Л.О. Угроза роста насилия в Северной Ирландии в контексте Брекзита // Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН. 2019. № 2 (8). С. 33-38. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran220193337 EDN: WJYKJI

5. Еремина Н.В. Корни Брекзита: конфликт идентичностей в Соединенном Королевстве // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2017. Т. 10, № 1. С. 87-105. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-1-87-105 EDN: WQHEFE

6. Тюрин Е.А. Влияние британской имперской государственности на шотландскую национальную идентичность: к вопросу о независимости Шотландии // Власть. 2017 a. Т. 25, № 8. С. 178-182. EDN: WQGXAG

7. Тюрин Е.А. Государство и нация: телеологические аспекты политического курса Шотландии // Управленческое консультирование. 2017 b. № 10 (106). С. 118-127. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2017-10-118-127 EDN: ZWOXKP

8. Тюрин Е.А., Савинова Е.Н. Национальный стиль развития политического процесса в современной Шотландии: к вопросу о шотландской идентичности // Власть. 2015. № 4. С. 195-201. EDN: TPHVQB

9. Фадеева Л.А. Идентичность на пересечении интеграции и деволюции: шотландский кейс // Современная Европа. 2015. № 5 (65). С. 91-99. EDN: VDWMVF

10. Харитонова Е.М. Динамика национальных и этнических идентичностей в современной Британии (Обзор) // Политическая наука. 2016. № 1. С. 224-235. EDN: VUCMDV

11. Харитонова E.М. Политическая ситуация в Британии через приму общественного мнения // Современная Европа. 2020. № 1 (94). С. 123-135. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope12020123134 EDN: VKEWGU

12. Carey S. Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? // European Union politics. 2002. Vol. 3, N 4. P. 387-413. DOI: 10.1177/1465116502003004001

13. Carl N. Lack of European identity and the failure of the Eurozone // The political quarterly. 2018. Vol. 89, N 1. P. 165-165. DOI: 10.1111/1467-923x.12474

14. Carl N., Dennison J., Evans G. European, but not European enough: an explanation for Brexit // European Union politics. 2018. Vol. 20, N 2. P. 282-304. DOI: 10.1177/1465116518802361

15. Curtice J. Why leave won the UK's referendum // Journal of common market studies. 2017. Vol. 55, N 19. P. 19-37. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12613

16. Heath A., Smith S. Varieties of nationalism in Scotland and England // Anglo-Scottish relations, from 1900 to devolution and beyond / W. Miller (ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 132-152.

17. Hobolt S.B. The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent // Journal of European public policy. 2016. Vol. 23, N 9. P. 1259-1277. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785

18. Hooghe L., Marks G. Calculation, community and cues: public opinion on European integration // European Union politics. 2005. Vol. 6, N 4. P. 419-443. DOI: 10.1177/1465116505057816

19. How Brexit was made in England / A. Henderson, C. Jeffrey, D. Wincott, R.W. Jones // The British journal of politics and international relations. 2017. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 631-646. DOI: 10.1177/1369148117730542

20. Markers and rules of Scottish national identity / R. Kiely, F. Bechhofer, D. Stewart,D. McCrone // Sociological review. 2001. Vol. 49, N 1. P. 53-69. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954x.00243

21. McCrone D., Bechhofer F. Understanding national identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 238 p.

22. McLaren L. Opposition to European integration and fear of loss of national identity: Debunking a basic assumption regarding hostility to the integration project // European journal of political research. 2004. Vol. 43, N 6. P. 895-912. DOI: 10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00179.x

23. Tatham M. Scotland and the European Union: Has devolution changed anything? // Scotland and Europe, Scotland in Europe / G. Leydier (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007. P. 214-229.