Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Contemporary anti-westernism in Russia and Turkey: the comparative analysis of Dugin’s Neo-Eurasianism and Davutoğlu’s Neo-Ottomanism

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.02.13

Abstract

   The article is devoted to the study of features of anti-Western ideologies in the context of the crisis of the liberal order. It provides a comparative analysis of the ideas of the leading ideologists of Neo-Eurasianism and Neo-Ottomanism – Alexander Dugin and Ahmet Davutoğlu. As a response to the quest for new identities and status of Russia and Turkey in the new world order, Neo-Eurasianism and Neo-Ottomanism appeared after the collapse of the USSR and the end of the Cold War. Both Dugin and Davutoğlu developed their own concepts of geopolitics, identity and foreign policy as an alternative to the Western ones. Using the method of discourse analysis and examining the works of Dugin and Davutoğlu, the author sets to reveal the patterns of contemporary Anti-Westernism. As demonstrated in the article, Davutoğlu and Dugin strongly oppose Western hegemony and support a multipolar world order in which non-Western states and civilizations will be represented. The Anti-Western ideologies developed by them not only oppose the hegemony of the West, but also reject the values, principles and paradigm of the West. At the same time, while Dugin criticizes the values of liberalism and globalization and considers the US the antithesis of Eurasia, Davutoğlu, in contrast, opposes such European values as modernity, secularism, the Enlightenment, and also criticizes Western epistemology and philosophy.

About the Author

Ü. N. Hazır
HSE
Russian Federation

Ümit Nazmi Hazır

Moscow



References

1. Aydın C. The politics of anti-Westernism in Asia: visions of world order in pan-Islamic and pan-Asian thought. New York: Columbia university press, 2017, 315 p.

2. Boroujerdi M. Iranian intellectuals and the West: The tormented triumph of nativism. New York: Syracuse university press, 1996, 292 p.

3. Buruma I., Margalit A. Occidentialism: the West in the Eyes of its enemies. New York: The Penguin press, 2004, 165 p.

4. Davutoğlu A. Strategic Depth: Turkey’s international position. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2009, 584 p. (In Turkish)

5. Davutoğlu A. Talks on Turkish foreign policy from theory to practice. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2013, 440 p. (In Turkish)

6. Davutoğlu A. Alternative paradigms: the impact of Western and Islamic Weltanschauung on political theories. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2018 a, 376 p. (In Turkish)

7. Davutoğlu A. Self-perceptions of civilizations: introduction to civilization theories. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2018, 219 p. (In Turkish)

8. Davutoğlu A. Civilization transformation: international order crisis and Islamic world. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2018 c, 208 p. (In Turkish)

9. Dugin A. The fourth political theory. Moscow: Eurasian movement, 2012, 245 p.

10. Dugin A. Putin vs Putin: Vladimir Putin viewed from the right. UK: Arktos, 2014, 320 p.

11. Dugin A. Noomachia: Wars of the Mind. Frontier civilizations: Russia, American civilization, the Semites and their civilization. Moscow: Academic project, 2014, 694 p. (In Russ.)

12. Dugin A. Last War of the world island. The geopolitics of contemporary Russia. London: Arktos, 2015, 168 p.

13. Dugin A. The frontage of humanity: Eurasia. Trans. E Ergen. İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 2017, 237 p. (In Turkish)

14. Dugin A. Russian geopolitics: Eurasianist approach. Trans. V. Imanov. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2010, 390 p. (In Turkish)

15. Dugin A. Fundamentals of geopolitics: the geopolitical future of Russia. Moscow: Arktogeja, 1997, 451 p. (In Russ.)

16. Erşen E. The evolution of ‘Eurasia’ as a geopolitical concept in Post–Cold War Turkey. Geopolitics. 2013, Vol. 18, N 1, P. 24–44. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2012.665106

17. Göksel O. Defying the system: the origins of anti-westernism in the non-western world and the case of Iran. Turkish journal of middle Eastern studies. 2019, Vol. 6, N 2, P. 13–42.

18. Guida M. Al-Afghānī and Namık Kemal’s replies to Ernest Renan: two anti-westernist works in the formative stage of Islamist thought. Turkish journal of politics. 2011, N 2 (2), P. 57–70.

19. İmanov V. Eurasianism. The identity quest of Russia. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2008, 417 p. (In Turkish)

20. İsmayılov M. Eurasianism. Comparative reading: Turkey and Russia cases. Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2011, 405 p. (In Turkish)

21. Kalın İ. Mind and virtue: Turkey’s social imagination. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2013, 416 p. (In Turkish)

22. Kalinin K. Neo-Eurasianism and the Russian elite: the irrelevance of Aleksandr Dugin’s geopolitics. Post-Soviet affairs. 2019, Vol. 35, N 5–6, P. 461–470. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2019.1663050

23. Kınıklıoğlu S. Eurasianism in Turkey. SWP research paper. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und – Politik German institute for international and security affairs, 2022, 32 p.

24. Laruelle M. Russian Eurasianism: an ideology of empire. Trans. Mischa Gabowitsch. Washington D. C: The Johns Hopkins university press, 2008, 276 p.

25. Lehti M., Pennanen H.-R, Jouhki J. (eds). Contestations of liberal order. the west in crisis? Turku: PLewis B. Islam and the West. New York: Oxford university press, 1994, 217 p.

26. Lewis B. What went wrong: Western impact and Middle Eastern response. New York: Oxford university press, 2002, 180 p.

27. Mishra P. From the ruins of Empire: The revolt against the West and the remaking of Asia. London: Allen Lane, 2012, 405 p.

28. Oran B. (ed). Turkish foreign policy, Volume III: 2001–2012. İstanbul: İletişim. 2013, 888 p. (In Turkish)

29. Perinçek M. Eurasianism: its theory and practice in Turkey. İstanbul: Kaynak, 2016, 304 p. (In Turkish)

30. Shlapentokh D. Ideological seduction and intellectuals in Putin's Russia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, 292 p.

31. Shlykov P. V. Eurasianism and eurasian integration in the political ideologies and practice of Turkey. Comparative politics in Russia. 2017, Vol. 8, N 1, P. 58–76. (In Russ.)

32. Silvius R. Eurasianism and Putin’s Embedded Civilizationalism. In: Lane D., Samokhvalov V. (eds). The Eurasian project and europe: regional discontinuities and geopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, P. 75–89.

33. Torbakov I. Neo-Ottomanism versus neo-Eurasianism? Nationalism and symbolic geography in post-imperial Turkey and Russia. Mediterranean quarterly. 2017, Vol. 28, N 2, P. 125–145. doi: 10.1215/10474552-4164303

34. Tsygankov A. Russian foreign policy: change and continuity in national identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield publishers, 2010, 265 p.

35. Tüfekçi Ö. Another last Eurasianist: Davutoğlu’s Eurasianist rhetoric. Caucasus international. 2012, Vol. 2, N 3, P. 101–109.

36. Tüysüzoğlu G. Strategic Depth: A Neo-Ottomanist interpretation of Turkish Eurasianism. Mediterranean quarterly. 2014, Vol. 25, N 2, P. 85–104. doi: 10.1215/10474552-2685776

37. Vaillant J. Dilemmas for anti-Western patriotism: Slavophilism and Negritude.

38. Yavuz H. Social and intellectual origins of Neo-Ottomanism: searching for a post-national vision. Die Welt des Islams. 2016, N 56, P 438–465.

39. Yavuz H. Nostalgia for the empire: the politics of Neo-Ottomanism. New York: Oxford university press, 2020, 317 p.algrave Macmillan, 2019, 384 p.


Review

Views: 455


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)