Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Parties as a privileged subject of the electoral process: The results of the institutional experience

Abstract

The article examines the expansion of electoral rights of formal parties at the expense of other collective and individual actors. The author proposes typology of countries depending on political parties privileges when nominating candidates for elections. The paper examines the anti-democratic effect of granting privileges for parties in the electoral process. The paper describes the experience of Eastern Europe in removal of free associations out of elections. It is noted also that in Western democracies political parties have privileges not over associations of citizens, but over independent candidates. In general, providing electoral privileges to formal parties is assessed as a threat to democracy as a whole.

About the Author

N. V. Grishin
Астраханский государственный университет
Russian Federation


References

1. Голосов Г.В. Электоральный авторитаризм в России // Pro et Contra. - М., 2008. - № 12 (1). - С. 22-35.

2. Гришин Н.В., Мармилова Е.П. Пути оптимизации избирательной системы России // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. - Астрахань, 2014. - № 1. - С. 79-90.

3. Политические партии и политическая конкуренция в демократических и недемократических режимах / Под ред. Ю.Г. Коргунюка, Е.Ю. Мелешкиной, Г.М. Михалевой. - М.: КМК, 2010. - 212 с.

4. Casal-Bertoa F., Piccio D., Rashkova E. Party law in comparative perspective. - Leiden, 2012. - 29 p. - (Leiden university. Working paper; N 16).

5. Biezen I. van, Bértoa F. Party regulation in post-authoritarian contexts: Southern Europe in comparative perspective // South European society and politics. - L., 2014. - Vol. 19, N 1. - P. 71-87.

6. Independent candidates in national and European elections. Study / P. Ehin, U. Madise et al. - Brussels, 2013. - 100 p. - (PE 493.008) - Mode of access: http://www.

7. europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/493008/IPOL-AFCO_ET(2013)493008_EN.pdf (Дата посещения: 27.11.2014.)

8. Leston-Bandeira C. Dissent in a party based parliament: the Portuguese case // Party politics. - L., 2009. - Vol. 15, N 6. - P. 695-713.

9. Scherlis G. Parties and ballot access in Latin America: a new trend in a new political context // International conference political legitimacy and the paradox of regulation. - Leiden, 2013. - P. 22-25.

10. European commission for democracy through law (Venice Commission). Report on the participation of political parties in elections: Adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 16 th meeting (Venice, 16 March 2006).. - Strasbourg, 2006. - 12 p. - (Study; N 329/2004; CDL-AD (2006) 025) - Mode of access: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2006)025-e(Дата посещения: 27.11.2014.)


Review

Views: 81


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)