Национализация партийной системы: российская специфика
Аннотация
В статье анализируется динамика национализации российской партийной системы. Фиксируется значимое расхождение между крайне низкой территориальной гомогенностью голосования по мажоритарной части российской избирательной системы (1993-2003) и очень высоким уровнем партийной национализации при голосовании по партийным спискам. Это расхождение, обусловленное наследием режимной трансформации, а также такими факторами, как федерализм и президенциализм, было усугублено встраиванием в общенациональный политический порядок губернаторских политических машин. Результаты исследования ставят под вопрос общепринятый тезис о тождественности процессов национализации электората и консолидации партийной системы.
Об авторах
Григорий Васильевич Голосов
Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге
Россия
Россия
Иван Сергеевич Григорьев
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. ЦИК. 2003-2013. Центральная избирательная комиссия Российской Федерации: Выборы и референдумы. - Режим доступа: http://www.izbirkom.ru (Дата посещения: 07.02.2014.)
2. Aldrich J.H. Why parties? The origin and transformation of party politics in America. - Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago press, 1995. - 349 p.
3. Berezkin A., Myagkov M., Ordeshook P.C. Location and political influence: A further elaboration of their effects on voting in recent Russian elections // Eurasian geography and economics. - L., 2003. - Vol. 44, N 3. - P. 169-183.
4. Bochsler D. Measuring party nationalisation: A new Gini-based indicator that corrects for the number of units // Electoral studies. - Oxford, 2010 a. - Vol. 29, N 1. - P. 155-168.
5. Bochsler D. The nationalisation of post-communist party systems // Europe-Asia studies. - L., 2010 b. - Vol. 62, N 5. - P. 807-827.
6. Brancati D. The origins and strengths of regional parties // British journal of political science. - Cambridge, 2008. - Vol. 38, N 1. - P. 135-159.
7. Cain B.E., Ferejohn J.A., Fiorina M.P. The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. - Cambridge: Harvard univ. press, 1987. - 279 p.
8. The american voter / A. Campbell et al. - Chicago: Univ. of Chicago press, 1960. - 573 p.
9. Caramani D. The nationalization of politics: The formation of national electorates and party systems in Western Europe. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2004. - 368 p.
10. Chhibber P., Kollman K. The formation of national party systems: Federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 2004. - 272 p.
11. Cox G.W. The efficient secret: The cabinet and the development of political parties in Victorian England. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1987. - 204 p.
12. Cox G.W. Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1997. - 360 p.
13. Enikolopov R., Petrova M., Zhuravskaya E. Media and political persuasion: Evidence from Russia // The American economic review. - Pittsburgh, 2011. - Vol. 101, N 7. - P. 3253-3285.
14. Feld S.L., Grofman B. The Laakso-Taagepera index in a mean and variance framework // Journal of theoretical politics. - L., 2007. - Vol. 19, N 1. - P. 101-106.
15. Fish M.S. The advent of multipartism in Russia, 1993-1995 // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 1995. - Vol. 11, N 4. - P. 340-383.
16. Gandhi J., Przeworski A. Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats // Comparative political studies. - L., 2007. - Vol. 40, N 11. - P. 1279-1301.
17. Gel’man V. From «feckless pluralism» to «dominant power politics»? The transformation of Russia’s party system // Democratization. - Routledge, 2006. - Vol. 13, N 4. - P. 545-561.
18. Gill G. The decline of a dominant party and the destabilization of electoral authoritarianism? // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 2012. - Vol. 28, N 4. - P. 449-471.
19. Golosov G.V. Party support or personal resources? Factors of success in the plurality portion of the 1999 national legislative elections in Russia // Communist and Post-Communist studies. - Elsevier, 2002. - Vol. 35, N 1. - P. 23-38.
20. Golosov G.V. Political parties in the regions of Russia: Democracy unclaimed. - Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner publishers, 2004. - 307 p.
21. Golosov G.V. The effective number of parties a new approach // Party politics. - L., 2010. - Vol. 16, N 2. - P. 171-192.
22. Golosov G.V. The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia // Europe-Asia studies. - Glasgow, 2011 a. - Vol. 63, N 4. - P. 623-639.
23. Golosov G.V. Russia’s regional legislative elections, 2003-2007: Authoritarianism incorporated // Europe-Asia studies. - Glasgow, 2011 b. - Vol. 63, N 3. - P. 397-414.
24. Golosov G.V. The 2012 political reform in Russia: The interplay of liberalizing concessions and authoritarian corrections // Problems of Post-Communism. - N.Y., 2012. - Vol. 59, N 6. - P. 3-14.
25. Golosov G.V. Machine politics: The concept and its implications for Post-Soviet studies // Demokratizatsiya. - Washington, DC, 2013. - Vol. 21, N 4. - P. 459-480.
26. Golosov G.V. The territorial genealogies of Russia’s political parties and the transferability of political machines // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 2014. - Vol. 30, N 6. - P. 464-480.
27. Golosov G.V. Party system nationalization: The problems of measurement with an application to federal states // Party politics. - L., S.a. - В печати.
28. Hale H.E. Explaining machine politics in Russia’s regions: Economy, ethnicity, and legacy // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 2003. - Vol. 19, N 3. - P. 228-263.
29. Hale H.E. Why not parties in Russia?: democracy, federalism, and the state. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2005. - 288 p.
30. Harbers I. Decentralization and the development of nationalized party systems in new democracies: Evidence from Latin America // Comparative political studies. - L., 2010. - Vol. 43, N 5. - P. 606-627.
31. Hicken A., Stoll H. Presidents and parties: How presidential elections shape coordination in legislative elections // Comparative political studies. - L., 2011. - Vol. 44, N 7. - P. 854-883.
32. Jones M.P., Mainwaring S. The nationalization of parties and party systems. An empirical measure and an application to the Americas // Party politics. - L., 2003. - Vol. 9, N 2. - P. 139-166.
33. Kahn J. Federalism, democratization, and the rule of law in Russia. - N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 2002. - 338 p.
34. Kasuya Y., Moenius J. The nationalization of party systems: Conceptual issues and alternative district-focused measures // Electoral studies. - Oxford, 2008. - Vol. 27, N 1. - P. 126-135.
35. Kitschelt H., Smyth R. Programmatic party cohesion in emerging Postcommunist democracies Russia in comparative context // Comparative political studies. - L., 2002. - Vol. 35, N 10. - P. 1228-1256.
36. Kollman K. et al. Constituency-level elections archive / Ann Arbor. - Michigan: Center for political studies: Univ. of Michigan. - Mode of access: http://www. electiondataarchive.org. (Дата посещения: 01.05.2011.)
37. Lago-Peñas I., Lago-Peñas S. Decentralization and the nationalization of party systems // Environment and planning C: Government and policy. - Pion, 2011. - Vol. 29. - P. 244-263.
38. Magaloni B., Kricheli R. Political order and one-party rule // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, 2010. - Vol. 13. - P. 123-143.
39. McCombs M. Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. - Cambridge: Polity press, 2004. - 208 p.
40. Meleshevich A. Geographical patterns of party support in the Baltic States, Russia, and Ukraine // European urban and regional studies. - L., 2006. - Vol. 13, N 2. - P. 113-129.
41. Merrill S., Grofman B. A unified theory of voting: Directional and proximity spatial models. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1999. - 230 p.
42. Moenius J., Kasuya Y. Measuring party linkage across districts some party system inflation indices and their properties // Party politics. - L., 2004. - Vol. 10, N 5. - P. 543-564.
43. Morgenstern S., Polga-Hecimovich J., Siavelis P.M. Seven imperatives for improving the measurement of party nationalization with Evidence from Chile // Electoral studies. - Oxford, 2014. - Vol. 33. - P. 186-199.
44. Morgenstern S., Swindle S.M., Castagnola A. Party nationalization and institutions // The journal of politics. - Cambridge, 2009. - Vol. 71, N 4. - P. 1322-1341.
45. Panov P., Ross C. Sub-national elections in Russia: Variations in United Russia’s domination of regional assemblies // Europe-Asia studies. - L., 2013. - Vol. 65, N 4. - P. 737-752.
46. Petrov N., Lipman M., Hale H.E. Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 2014. - Vol. 30, N 1. - P. 1-26.
47. Rae D.W. The political consequences of electoral laws. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1967. - 173 p.
48. Reuter O.J., Remington T.F. Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem the case of United Russia // Comparative political studies. - L., 2009. - Vol. 42, N 4. - P. 501-526.
49. Reuter O.J. Regional patrons and hegemonic party electoral performance in Russia // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 2013. - Vol. 29, N 2. - P. 101-135.
50. Riker W.H. Federalism: Origin, operation, significance. - Boston: Brown little, 1964. - 169 p.
51. Robinson N. Institutional factors and Russian political parties: the changing needs of regime consolidation in a neo-patrimonial system // East European politics. - L., 2012. - Vol. 28, N 3. - P. 298-309.
52. Rodden J., Wibbels E. Dual accountability and the nationalization of party competition: Evidence from four federations // Party Politics. - L., 2011. - Vol. 17, N 5. - P. 629-653.
53. Rose R., Mishler W. A supply-demand model of party-system institutionalization: The Russian case // Party politics. - L., 2010. - Vol. 16, N 6. - P. 801-821.
54. Rose R., Munro N., White S. Voting in a floating party system: The 1999 Duma election // Europe-Asia studies. - L., 2001. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 419-443.
55. Rose R., Urwin D.W. Regional differentiation and political unity in Western nations. - L.: SAGE publications, 1975. - 53 p.
56. Ross C. Federalism and democratization in Post-Communist Russia. - Manchester: Manchester univ. press, 2003. - 196 p.
57. Sakwa R. Russia’s «permanent» (uninterrupted) elections of 1999-2000 // The Journal of communist studies and transition politics. - L., 2000. - Vol. 16, N 3. - P. 85-112.
58. Electoral authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition / A. Schedler (ed.). - Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2006. - 267 p.
59. Shugart M.S., Carey J.M. Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1992. - 332 p.
60. Simón P. The combined impact of decentralisation and personalism on the nationalisation of party systems // Political studies. - L., 2013. - Vol. 61, N S1. - P. 24-44.
61. Smyth R., Lowry A., Wilkening B. Engineering victory: Institutional reform, informal institutions, and the formation of a hegemonic party regime in the Russian Federation // Post-Soviet affairs. - Washington, DC, 2007. - Vol. 23, N 2. - P. 118-137.
62. Smyth R. Candidate strategies and electoral competition in the Russian Federation: Democracy without foundation. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2006. - 260 p.
63. Stokes D.E. Parties and the nationalization of electoral forces // The American party system: Stages of political development / W.N. Chambers, W.D. Burnham. (ed.) - N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1967. - P. 182-202.
64. Taagepera R., Shugart M.S. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1989. - 292 p.
65. Thorlakson L. An institutional explanation of party system congruence: Evidence from six federations // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 2007. - Vol. 46, N 1. - P. 69-95.
66. Tiemann G. The nationalization of political parties and party systems in post-communist Eastern Europe // Communist and Post-Communist studies. - Elsevier, 2012. - Vol. 45, N 1. - P. 77-89.
67. Vertz L.L., Frendreis J.P., Gibson J.L. Nationalization of the electorate in the United States // The American political science review. - Cambridge, 1987. - Vol. 81, N 2. - P. 961-966.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
95
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 