Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Power and making of meaning, or political pragmasemantics

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.03.07

Abstract

Political power abstract concept using leads to paradoxicality and inconsistency in the theoretical constructions of political science. Without power, individuals cannot form a community necessary to achieve the good of each of them, but at the same time, any power is a restriction, suppression of subjectivity. Therefore, political power presupposes the formation of a certain semantic picture of the world, which explains and justifies the orders implemented by that power. Such a dominant semantic picture of the world provides the basis for the legitimacy of power, the consolidation of society, and common identity. It is multi-layered and fluid; and its formation involves not only the political class, but also the humanities, the education system, and personal experience. This process can be represented by the pragmasemantic approach as a cascade of interfaces (contexts) of meaning formation, each of which is operationalized as a value-regulatory system (VRS). From this point of view, the political power appears as the main VRS, which, in order to justify its influence on the ordering of others, claims to have the dominant semantic picture of world. However, society development needs the constructive variability of the reality comprehension and needs the power organization formats, capable of generating and maintaining such variability. Thus, political theory also needs a transition from operating with general abstractions to the constructive understanding of the procedural and operational nature of politics as applied to specific societies, taking into account their current problems and historical experience. Nowadays, this topic acquires a non-trivial significance, when the formats of the VRS in management, business, science, education, art, and personal life are radically changing.

About the Author

G. L. Tulchinskii
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; HSE University
Russian Federation

Tulchinskii Grigorii, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University,

Kaliningrad;

HSE University,

Saint Petersburg.



References

1. Arkhipova A., Mikhajlik E. Dangerous signs and Soviet things. New literary review. 2017, N 143 (1), P. 130–153. (In Russ.)

2. Asemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2015, 512 p. (In Russ.)

3. Berger P., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Academia, Medium, 1995, 323 p. (In Russ.)

4. Boltanski L., Thévenot L. Criticism and justification of justice. Essays on the sociology of cities. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2013, 576 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space. St.Petersburg; Moscow: Aletheia, 2007, 288 p. (In Russ.)

6. Dahl R.A. Democracy and Its Critics. Moscow: Rosspen, 2003, 576 p. (In Russ.)

7. Edelman M. Politics as symbolic action. Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago: Academic Press, 2013, 198 p.

8. Edelman M. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois press, 1985, 232 p.

9. Gerasimov S.V. Special events as triggers of sociocultural processes. St.Petersburg: Aletheia, 2022, 492 p. (In Russ.)

10. Gobbes T. Works in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1991, 731 p. (In Russ.)

11. Harari Yu.N. Sapiens. Brief history of humankind. Moscow: Sinbad, 2021, 520 p. (In Russ.)

12. Harrison L. Who Thrives? How cultural values contribute to economic and political success. Moscow: New publishing house, 2008, 300 p. (In Russ.)

13. Harrison L., Huntington, S. (eds). Culture matters. How values contribute to social progress. Moscow: MShPI, 2002, 320 p. (In Russ.)

14. Inglehart R. Cultural Evolution: People's Motivations are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Moscow: Mysl, 2018, 347 p. (In Russ.)

15. Kiselev K.V. Symbolic politics: power vs. society. Ekaterinburg: Publishing House “Discourse-Pi”, 2006, 132 p. (In Russ.)

16. Kiyashchenko L.P. (ed.) Man as an open integrity: a collective monograph. Novosibirsk: Academizdat, 2022, 530 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kozhev A. The concept of power. Moscow: Praxis, 2006, 192 p.

18. Kocheryagina E.P. Cinema as an instrument of symbolic politics in Russia 2000–2017: experience in the formation of historical memory. Public Policy, 2019, Vol. 3, N 1, P. 61–74. (In Russ.)

19. Ledyaev V.G. Power: a conceptual analysis. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2001, 384 p. (In Russ.)

20. Lyon D. The electronic eye: the rise of surveillance society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994, 290 p.

21. Makarenko V.P. Collected works in 5 volumes. Rostov-on-Don; Taganrog: Publishing House of the Southern Federal University, 2021. Volume 1. – 628 p.; Volume 2. – 661 p.; Volume 3. – 638 p.; Volume 4. – 657 p.; T. 5. – 661 p. (In Russ.)

22. Lakoff G. The political mind: A cognitive scientist's guide to your brain and its politics. New York etc., 2009, 320 р.

23. Lukes S. Moral Conflict and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, 324 p.

24. Lukes S. Liberals and Cannibals. London: Verso, 2003, 192 p.

25. Lukes S. Power: A Radical View. 3 rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, 204 р.

26. Malinova O. Yu. Symbolic policy: contours of the problem field. Symbolic policy. Issue. 1: Constructing ideas about the past as a power resource. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012, p. 5–16. (In Russ.)

27. Moseychik G.I. Economics of semiotics as an economics of vices and virtues of the post-modern era. Economics of vices and virtues. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 2015, P. 68–69. (In Russ.)

28. North D. Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy. Moscow: FEK Nachala, 1997, 180 p. (In Russ.)

29. North D., Wallis D., Weingast B. Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting the written history of humankind. Moscow: Gaidar Institute, 2011, 480 p. (In Russ.)

30. Nye J.S. Yr. The Powers to Lead. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, 248 р.

31. Nye J.S. Yr. Soft Power: The means to Success in World Politics. New York Public Affairs, Perseus books Group, 2004, 191 р.

32. Olejnik A.N. Power and the market: The system of socio-economic domination in Russia in the “zero” years. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2011, 437 p. (In Russ.)

33. Public values and public administration: Collective monograph. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2014, 400 p. (In Russ.)

34. Symbolic policy. Issue 1: Designing ideas about the past as a powerful resource / ed. by O.Yu. Malinova. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012, 334 p. (In Russ.)

35. Symbolic policy. Issue 2: Disputes about the past as the design of the future / ed. by O.Yu. Malinova. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, 382 p. (In Russ.)

36. Symbolic policy. Issue 3: Political functions of myths. /ed. by O.Yu. Malinova. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015, 372 p. (In Russ.)

37. Symbolic policy. Issue 4: Social construction of space / ed.by O.Yu. Malinova. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016, 371 p. (In Russ.)

38. Symbolic policy. Issue 5: Identity policy / ed. by O.Yu. Malinova. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2017, 356 p. (In Russ.)

39. Travin V. Ya. Why is Russia behind? St. Petersburg: St.Petersburg European University, 2021, 368 p. (In Russ.)

40. Tulchinskii G.L. Historical memory, heritage and education. Heritage. 2018, N 1 (12), P. 8–15. (In Russ.)

41. Tulchinskii G.L. Narration in Symbolic Politics: Levels and Diachrony. Symbolic Policy. Issue 4: Social construction of space / ed.by O. Yu. Malinova. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016, P. 65–83. (In Russ.)

42. Tulchinskii G.L. The Body of Freedom: Responsibility and Embodiment of Meaning. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, 2019, 470 p. (In Russ.)

43. Tulchinskii G.L. (ed.) Fakes: communication, meanings, responsibility. Collective monograph. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, 2021, 288 p. (In Russ.)

44. Tulchinskii G.L. Explanation in political science: constructivism vs positivism. Public Policy. 2017, N 1, P. 76–98. (In Russ.)

45. Tulchinskii G.L. Justice and justice: types of justice, power and related conflicts. Man. Culture. Education. 2015, N 2 (16), P. 52–75. (In Russ.)

46. Tulchinskii G.L. Pragmasemantics of digital communications: semantic pictures of the world, value-regulatory systems and responsibility. State and citizens in the electronic environment. Issue 6. St. Petersburg: ITMO, 2022, P. 9–23. (In Russ.)

47. Weber M. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968, 1469 р.

48. Weber M. Politics as a calling and a profession. Moscow: Ripol classic, 2021, 130 p. (In Russ.)

49. Zolyan S. On pragma-semantics of expressives. Between words and actions. In: Haselow A., Hancil S. Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Publ., 2021, P. 245–271.


Review

Views: 227


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)